June 17, 2014 at 11:37 pm

6th Circuit to weigh Mich. gay marriage case, 4 others in 1 session

Cincinnati – — A federal appeals court will hear arguments in gay marriage fights in Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky and Tennessee in a single session, setting the stage for historic rulings in each state.

The 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, based in Cincinnati, scheduled arguments in five cases from the four states for Aug. 6. Though the cases are unique, each deals with whether statewide gay marriage bans violate the Constitution.

“I think the way the court’s approaching it is significant,” said Al Gerhardstein, a Cincinnati civil rights attorney who represents plaintiffs in two Ohio cases that will go before the appeals court. “They see the need to do some basic rulings on core principles cutting across all these state lines. It’s very exciting.”

Louisville attorney Dawn Elliott, who represents eight plaintiffs in the Kentucky case, said she and her co-counsel plan to make their arguments personal, focusing on the people affected by the ruling.

“Our plaintiffs are all planning on being there, because it’s harder to say no to somebody when you’re looking at them, to say, ‘No, your marriage is not valid because you’re gay,’ ” said Elliott’s co-counsel, Shannon Fauver.

The 6th Circuit is the third federal appeals court to weigh recent challenges to state gay marriage bans, though the first to consider cases in so many states at the same time. Arguments were held in the 4th Circuit in Virginia concerning one case in May and the 10th Circuit in Denver concerning two cases in April. Rulings are expected soon.

In Cincinnati, a three-judge panel will hear arguments in each case one at a time. It’s unclear whether it will issue a large ruling encompassing all the cases or separate ones. Any losing side could appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.

More than a dozen federal and state judges have struck down part or all of state-level bans in recent months. No rulings have gone the other way.

The 6th Circuit’s decision to consolidate the cases is unusual but not unprecedented, said Carl Tobias, a professor of constitutional law at the University of Richmond.

He pointed to the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. Board of Education, which consolidated five segregation cases, and rulings on other issues including abortion.

An order overturning Michigan’s statewide gay marriage ban followed a rare trial that focused mostly on the impact of same-sex parenting on children.

More than 300 couples were married on a Saturday in March before the ruling was suspended pending appeal.

Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder has said his state won’t recognize the 300 marriages performed in March because the ban is still the law.

Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette is appealing a decision that declared Michigan’s ban unconstitutional.

Meanwhile, former high-ranking Republicans in the Michigan Legislature urged the 6th Circuit Court to allow gay marriage in the state.

They filed a brief Monday urging it to affirm a March decision that threw out Michigan’s ban on same-sex marriage. The Republicans include former House Speaker Rick Johnson and former House Majority Leader Chris Ward.

Former U.S. Rep. John “Joe” Schwartz has signed on, along with former state lawmakers Leon Drolet, Doug Hart, Dave Honigman and Susan Grimes Gilbert.

They say denying marriage to same-sex couples runs counter to strengthening families. They say it’s a conservative position to take.