That buzzing sound overhead may soon signal the arrival of the 21st-century version of a guy in a hardhat and bucket truck.
State transportation departments are increasingly studying the use of drones for everything from inspecting bridges to clearing car accidents.
Michigan transportation officials are set to begin a two-year study. Minnesota has tested a drone to help conduct safety inspections of bridges. Vermont is using federal grant dollars to study the use of drones to monitor river flooding and figure out how much material is needed to fix roads.
And in Massachusetts, a group has also been looking at the pros and cons of drone use, from potential threats to their possible use surveying construction projects.
The states are among 33 that have studied or used drones, helped develop drone polices, or aided in drone research.
That’s according to a new survey by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, which represents departments of transportation in all 50 states, Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico.
The Michigan study is part of a longer review. In 2014, state transportation officials there conducted a study with the Michigan Tech Research Institute that found drones potentially useful for a range of transportation tasks, from assessing bridge decks and monitoring traffic to processing thermal data and inspecting confined spaces.
The first study determined that drones are safe, reliable, less expensive and help keep workers out of harm’s way, said Steven Cook, a Michigan Department of Transportation engineer.
“A traditional bridge inspection for example typically involves setting up work zones, detouring traffic and using heavy equipment,” Cook said. “(Drones) can get in and get out quickly.”
Michigan officials estimate that a standard bridge deck inspection takes eight hours, a crew of four people and heavy equipment at a cost of about $4,600. The same inspection with a drone takes two people just two hours at an estimated cost of about $250.
At the University of Vermont, researchers using federal grant money are developing programs to let drones estimate how much fill it will take to repair a damaged roadway by feeding images collected from above the site through a computer program.
Drones aren’t welcome everywhere. The Massachusetts group includes representatives from the Massachusetts Department of Transportation Aeronautics Division, as well as the attorney general’s office and the state highway division — an acknowledgment that drones and airplanes don’t always mix.
Pilots are increasingly worried about drones operating too close to airports or in flight paths, fueling fears of a midair collision.
Reports of errant drones flouting U.S. regulations including flying too close to passenger airliners and other aircraft surged late last year to an average of four incidents per day, according to Federal Aviation Administration data.
The 1,200 incident reports in 2015 were more than five times the 236 the FAA recorded a year earlier when it first began compiling the data. By the second half of last year, there were an average of four reports per day, according to figures released by the agency.
Massachusetts officials say that while they’re exploring how to develop workplace applications for drones, they also need to work with the Federal Aviation Administration to resolve statutory and regulatory issues. All drone testing must be approved by the FAA.
The FAA has already been looking ahead to a time when drones are routinely employed for bridge inspections and other uses.
Last year, the agency proposed rules to let small commercial unmanned aircraft — under 55 pounds — perform tasks like aerial photography and cell tower inspections.
FAA Administrator Michael Huerta said at the time that the agency was trying to be flexible and maintain safety “without placing an undue regulatory burden on an emerging industry.”
The proposed rules would require commercial operators to pass a knowledge test and federal security check. Operators would have to keep drones within eyesight.
Copyright 2016 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.