Millennials trail their parents financially
Chicago — When Julius Givens moved to Chicago after graduating from college in 2013, he spent six months delivering sandwiches by bicycle while living with two other roommates in a studio apartment.
“I had no money” and more than $20,000 in student loans after earning a bachelor’s degree from the University of Missouri, said Givens, who aspired to be a firefighter at the time. “It’s tight living with three people in a studio, but you figure out how to handle it.”
Scrimping was a way of life for Givens, and it still is for some in his generation. Through a fluke in the timing of their births, 75 million young adults in the millennial generation entered adulthood as the economy was in or coming out of one of the worst recessions in U.S. history. And that’s left an indelible financial mark on today’s 25- to 34-year-olds.
Most have found jobs since the harsh days of unemployment, but their incomes are 20 percent lower than what baby boomers earned at the same age, according to a new study by Young Invincibles, an advocacy group for millennials. They also have half of the net wealth the baby boomer generation had accrued by roughly the same age.
Millennials fall short in other ways as well. Numerous studies point out that millennials have fewer cars and homes, less savings and other assets, and a lot more student loans than their parents had when they were young.
Givens doesn’t begrudge the situation. He says he’s doing better than his mother did at his age, since she worked and raised six children on her own in St. Louis. He feels fortunate to have a professional job in the medical products industry and backing for a business he’s starting. He now lives comfortably in a two-bedroom apartment with a roommate in Chicago’s Wicker Park neighborhood.
“I’m not hurting for anything,” Givens said. “I don’t need a car or a house.”
But many millennials will struggle to achieve the financial wherewithal their parents had.
A study by the New York Federal Reserve in 2015 showed that a recession early in a career can drag down earnings at the time and then continue to stunt paycheck growth as people move on to other jobs through a lifetime of work.
Additional research by the St. Louis Federal Reserve attributed the tremendous increase in 25-year-olds living with parents to the fact that 40 percent of graduates around the time of the recession ended up being underemployed. In other words, they started jobs that required fewer skills and provided lower pay than would be expected based on the level of their education. From 2012 to 2013, almost half of millennials were living at home, compared with only a quarter of the same age adults in 1999.
“Incomes earned early in one’s career often set the stage for lifetime earnings,” said Tom Allison, deputy director of policy and research for Young Invincibles. “When you start from a lower rung, it’s harder to negotiate a higher salary.”
Using U.S. government data from the Survey of Consumer Finances, Young Invincibles researchers found that young adult workers earned $40,581 in 2013, compared with the average $50,910, adjusted for inflation, that young adults earned in 1989.
“You can’t earn 20 percent less income and have the same standard of living as the baby boomers,” said Downers Grove financial planner Adam Glassberg, 30.
“The more you save early in life, the more flexibility you have later,” Glassberg said. “The impact of lower income and lower net worth will be millennials’ redefining retirement — working longer; maybe into their 70s; not 65.”
Many millennials are delaying home purchases because they don’t have down payments, but by putting off home purchases to their late 30s, they will likely find themselves with the burden of house payments in their retirement years, Glassberg said. In addition, he notes, this generation — with mortgage loans first taken late in their 30s — won’t have the luxury of borrowing from the equity in homes to send children to college.
Further, because they were unemployed or underemployed after the recession, many millennials missed the chance to buy homes when prices were cheap. Consequently, they didn’t get the advantage of building wealth effortlessly through sharply rising values during the housing recovery, the St. Louis Federal Reserve found.
Perhaps parents made homes possible for some millennials. A Harris poll after the recession, sponsored by the National Endowment for Financial Education, found that 29 percent of parents were helping their children pay for mortgages or rent.
Despite the burdens left on millennials by college student loans, the Young Invincibles’ study made it clear that obtaining a college degree is more necessary for millennials than it was for baby boomers.
Today a young adult needs a college degree in order to reach earnings that are equivalent to what an individual could earn without any college degree in 1989, federal data show.
Going to college and finishing without any debt, however, doesn’t put millennials on par with their parents’ generation. Recent college graduates without student loans are trailing the 25- to 34-year-olds of 1989 who also had graduated from college without debt. The median net worth of this group in 1989 was $125,572 compared with just $75,000 for millennials with degrees, according to the Young Invincibles report.
The reason for the difference may not be entirely income. Millennials also tend to be making lifestyle choices that are different from their parents’ generation.
Lewis Minaglia, who is now 26, lived with his parents in the suburbs for 21/2 years after graduating with a business degree from DePaul University. His goal was to save enough money to buy a home.
But once he’d accumulated enough for a small down payment, he decided he “wanted to be carefree.” He left his parents’ home in the suburbs at age 25 and moved to a one-bedroom apartment in the city’s ritzy Gold Coast neighborhood. Now he has the city life he craved while commuting to work, and no home or car payment will limit his choices if he decides to move for a job or a new neighborhood, he said.