Lansing rescinds calling itself ‘sanctuary city’
Lansing — Michigan’s capital city on Wednesday rescinded its decision to deem itself a “sanctuary city” protecting immigrants, bowing to concerns from the business community that the ambiguous, contentious term may draw unwanted attention to Lansing.
The City Council voted 5-2 to reverse course after last week’s 6-0 vote to call itself a sanctuary. The term “sanctuary city” has no legal definition and varies in application, but it generally refers to jurisdictions that do not cooperate with U.S. immigration officials. Under Lansing city policy, police don’t ask for people’s immigration status, except as required by U.S. or Michigan law or a court order.
After the new vote, advocates in the crowd called council members “spineless” and said “you’re all losing your seats.”
After last week’s vote, council members received a letter from the Lansing Regional Chamber and Michigan Chamber of Commerce urging them to remove references to “sanctuary city” from its resolution. The dispute over the term “sanctuary city” comes as several cities are battling President Donald Trump’s promised crackdown on places that block cooperation between their police departments and U.S. immigration authorities.
“The term ‘sanctuary’ in the resolution has become very problematic and distracting — so distracting in my opinion that’s it’s taken away from the intent of our resolution, which is to protect individuals,” said Councilwoman Judi Brown Clarke. “It’s basically a ‘don’t ask’ policy, which was outlined by the mayor’s executive order and what we had in our policy complements that.”
That was already the policy in Lansing before last week’s vote, but Lansing called itself a “welcoming city,” rather than a “sanctuary city.” Neither the welcoming city resolution nor the sanctuary city resolution called for Lansing to prohibit workers from providing information on a person’s immigration status with U.S. immigration officials — a ban that’s at the heart of some urban sanctuary cities disagreements with the Trump administration.
Business leaders in Michigan expressed concern that the term “sanctuary city” would draw unwelcome attention from the Trump administration, which has warned that sanctuary cities could lose federal money for refusing to cooperate with immigration authorities. The administration has started publishing weekly reports of local jurisdictions that aren’t cooperating with federal efforts to find and deport immigrants in the country illegally.
“Lansing is a diverse community, rich with history and culture. It’s what makes our city a welcoming destination to live, work and thrive,” the business groups’ letter says. “Recent actions of City Council, whether intended or not, have placed an unnecessary target on the city of Lansing while jeopardizing millions of dollars in federal funding that impacts the city budget.”
Mayor Virg Bernero has said he is confident Lansing’s policies don’t violate federal law, but “we are also prepared to take legal action to protect the prerogatives and powers of local government and local law enforcement.”
Michigan Chamber President and CEO Richard Studley said the group’s members want city officials “to stop wasting time on costly political statements and focus on real economic issues.”
“I have no problem with the earlier resolution that affirmed the city’s status as a welcoming city,” Studley said. “The challenge is with the language declaring the city a ‘sanctuary city’ — adopted hastily with little debate. I think that it is easily misinterpreted or misunderstood.”
The issue also has touched off debate in the Republican-controlled Michigan Legislature, which is considering banning local governments from enacting or enforcing rules that limit communication and cooperation with federal officials concerning people’s immigration status. Similar legislation died in the last session.
Clarke believes that the term “sanctuary” could be getting in the way of helping constituents.
“I think ultimately what we learned is … we thought we could define what ‘sanctuary city’ meant, and in actuality, it has its own negative connotation,” she said. “The only way to take that away is to take that word away.”
Copyright 2017 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.