FDA seeks more data on safety of hospital hand cleaners

Matthew Perrone
Associated Press
View Comments

Washington — Federal health officials say more information is needed to establish the safety and effectiveness of common hand cleaners used in hospitals, doctors’ offices and nursing homes to kill germs and prevent infections.

The Food and Drug Administration is asking manufacturers to submit additional data about medical hand washes and sanitizers, including the long-term effects of their daily use on the skin.

Under a proposed rule published Thursday, companies will have until 2018 to submit new data on key safety issues, including possible hormonal effects and contributions to antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Products that are not shown to be safe or effective would have to be reformulated or removed from the market.

For now, the FDA stressed that health care workers should continue using hand washes, sanitizers and surgical scrubs, which are standard tools for preventing health care infections.

“We’re not asking for any of these products to come off the market at this time, we’re just asking for additional data,” Theresa Michele, a director in the agency’s drug center, said in an interview with the Associated Press. “And we’re likewise not suggesting that people stop using these products.”

The antiseptic ingredients at issue, including alcohol and iodine, have been used by doctors and nurses for decades. But FDA scientists say their routine use has increased over the last 20 years as health professionals ramp up efforts to fight hospital infections. Widely adopted professional guidelines currently recommend doctors and nurses sanitize their hands before and after visiting each patient’s room.

“Twenty years ago you didn’t find people using antiseptic gels 100 times a day, it just didn’t happen,” Michele said.

Regulators are also concerned about emerging science suggesting antiseptics are absorbed into the body at higher levels than previously thought, showing up in the blood and urine of users.

“We now understand that many of these ingredients that we thought are just put on the skin are actually systemically absorbed,” Michele said.

The FDA wants companies to provide data from both human and animal studies on absorption rates, blood levels, toxicology and possible links to cancer and hormonal problems. Regulators say they will use this information to determine safety thresholds for users, particularly vulnerable groups like pregnant women and breastfeeding health care workers.

The FDA will also seek information about possible links between use of antiseptics and the growth of so-called superbug bacteria, which are resistant to antibiotics.

Despite these unresolved questions, the agency said in a statement that its actions “should not be taken to mean the FDA believes that these products are ineffective or unsafe.”

The FDA review encompasses nearly 30 antiseptic ingredients and is part of a decade-spanning bureaucratic process which was only recently jumpstarted by a lawsuit against the agency.

The FDA was first tasked with evaluating antiseptic soaps and scrubs in 1972 as part of a law designed to set guidelines for hundreds of drugs and chemicals that were already on the market but had never been formally reviewed.

The review process has dragged on through decades of regulatory delays and missed deadlines. And until Thursday the FDA had not updated its review of health care hand cleaners since 1994.

The agency agreed to complete its review after a three-year legal battle with the Natural Resources Defense Council, an environmental group that accused the FDA of delaying action on potentially dangerous chemicals. In 2013 the FDA agreed to a legal settlement that included timetables for completing the review of various chemicals, including health care cleaners.

Environmentalists are mainly concerned about an ingredient called triclosan, which is used in most antibacterial soaps marketed to consumers. Some scientists worry that triclosan and a related chemical, triclocarban, can interfere with hormone levels and spur the growth of drug-resistant bacteria. The agency issued a separate review of triclosan-containing consumer products in late 2013, saying more data is needed to establish their safety and effectiveness.

The ingredient is found in some health care hand washes and cleaners, but is far less common than ingredients like alcohol and chloroxylenol, according to FDA officials.

Those chemicals are sold to hospitals in hand sanitizers, surgical scrubs and other formulations that can be used without water. Manufacturers include Gojo Industries Inc., which markets Purell and Provon brands to both consumers and health care facilities.

The American Cleaning Institute, a cleaning products trade organization, said it agreed with the FDA’s recommendation that health care workers continue using antiseptic products.

“While manufacturers have submitted extensive data already, we will continue working with the FDA and provide the necessary information to answer their questions,” the group said in a statement.

Companies will have one year to submit new data and information about their products before FDA begins finalizing its rules for antiseptics. The agency will also take comments from the public for six months.

View Comments