Congress’ front line moves to immigration
Washington — Republican leaders, top Democrats and President Donald Trump are all claiming big wins in the $400 billion budget agreement signed into law Friday. But the push to pass the massive legislation underscored enduring divisions within both parties, and those rifts are likely to make the next fight over immigration even more challenging.
In Washington’s latest display of governance by brinkmanship, the bipartisan accord bolstering military and domestic programs and deepening federal deficits crossed the finish line just before dawn — but not before the government shut down overnight.
In what amounts to an achievement these days, lawmakers limited the overnight closure to less than nine hours — the time between when agencies technically ran out of money at midnight and Trump’s morning signing of the bill. It was the government’s second shutdown in three weeks, following the January’s three-day closure when Senate Democrats demanding legislation shielding young “Dreamer” immigrants from deportation blocked a bill keeping agencies open.
This time, Senate passage was delayed until after midnight when Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., stalled the vote to protest Congress’ willingness to drive up deficits. Paul said he hoped his stand would teach conservatives “to not accept just anything because it comes from a GOP Congress,” but House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., called the brief shutdown “entirely needless.”
The budget measure provides Pentagon spending increases sought by Trump and the GOP, more money for domestic agencies demanded by Democrats and $89 billion that both wanted for disaster relief. The two-year pact, which also continues the government’s authority to borrow money, postpones any possible federal default or likely shutdowns until after the November elections.
But the 652-page budget bill says nothing about protecting the Dreamer immigrants, and that largely explains why a quarter of Senate Democrats and two-thirds of House Democrats voted no. Passage left Democrats with little leverage to force congressional action on preventing deportation of hundreds of thousands of the young immigrants who arrived in the U.S. as children and remain here without permanent legal protection.
“Democrats have fought hard but, in the end, many opted to say yes to other priorities and leave Dreamers behind,” said Frank Sharry, executive director of the pro-immigration America’s Voice. He called that decision plus opposition by many Republicans “inhumane and indecent.”
Battle starts Monday
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., set next Monday as the start of a free-wheeling immigration battle, a debate he promised when Democrats agreed to vote to reopen the government last month. Ryan hasn’t scheduled House consideration, infuriating Democrats, but he said Friday, “We will focus on bringing that debate to this floor and finding a solution.”
Democrats want to extend the Obama-era Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, or DACA, which lets the immigrants temporarily live and work in the U.S. but that Trump would end March 5. The Democrats also want to make the immigrants eligible for citizenship or permanent residence.
In exchange, Trump wants $25 billion to build his beloved, proposed U.S.-Mexico border wall and other barriers. He also wants reductions in legal immigration, including limiting the relatives whom legal residents can sponsor and eliminating a lottery that offers visas to residents of diverse countries.
There’s no obvious compromise that could win the 60 votes from Republicans and Democrats needed to prevail in the Senate. The most promising outcome may be a narrow bill extending DACA protections for a year or so and providing some border security money for Trump.
Whatever happens, this week’s budget battle dealt a clear immigration defeat to Democrats, who’d initially vowed to block spending bills until there was a deal to help the Dreamers. The setback left party members divided.
No. 2 Senate Democratic leader Richard Durbin of Illinois, a leader in the immigration fight, said the budget pact “opens the door” for Senate votes on protecting the young immigrants. But Rep. Luis Gutierrez, D-Ill., said anyone supporting the spending measure was “colluding with this president and this administration to deport Dreamers.”
Such disputes won’t help the party energize the Hispanic and liberal voters it will need as it tries capturing House and perhaps Senate control in November.
Immigration divides Republicans, too.
Sen. Jeff Flake of Arizona is preparing compromises to offer during his chamber’s upcoming debate and says his party will suffer in November if the issue isn’t addressed. No. 3 House GOP leader Steve Scalise of Louisiana says Republicans still disagree about “how to handle this number of people that Barack Obama encouraged to come in here illegally.”
How Michiganians voted
With the immigration fight looming, Congress voted overnight to finance the government through March 23, giving budget-writers time to craft detailed legislation funding agencies through the rest of this fiscal year.
The House voted 240-186 to approve the bill just before dawn Eastern time, hours after the Senate approved the measure 71-28, with some of Congress’ most conservative and liberal lawmakers voting no.
All but four of Michigan’s 13 members in the House supported the measure. Reps. Justin Amash, R-Cascade Township; Sandy Levin, D-Royal Oak; Dan Kildee, D-Flint Township; and Debbie Dingell, D-Dearborn; voted no.
There was far less drama in the Senate, where the measure sailed through by a 71-28 tally once Paul’s protest ran its course.
Democratic Sens. Debbie Stabenow of Lansing and Gary Peters of Bloomfield Township voted yes.
Stabenow, who had pushed for funding for community health centers, was pleased the measure reauthorized the program for two years. It also included an additional four years of authorization for the Children’s Health Insurance Program.
“This is a big relief for our families, veterans and children who won’t have to wonder anymore if they’ll be able to see a doctor,” Stabenow said.
Rep. Mike Bishop, R-Rochester, noted that a lot of the spending is “one-time stuff that we can’t avoid.”
For example, $89 billion will go toward disaster aid for hurricane-ravaged communities in Texas, Florida, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands, and $6 billion over two years to fight the opioid epidemic.
Kildee voted against the bill in part because Republicans are giving “lip service” to a commitment to find a legislative fix for those people brought to the country illegally as children, known as “Dreamers,” he said.
He’s also disappointed that the measure included an $80 billion increase in defense spending without any obligation for reforms or increased efficiencies at the Pentagon. He noted the “sacrifices” made by the community of Osconda to recover after the closure of Wurtsmith Air Force Base in 1993.
Dingell said she was pleased that the bill included funding for disaster aid and the opioid crisis, as well as the creation of a joint select committee on pensions.
“It is greatly disappointing, however, that the legislation includes a controversial provision to further means testing Medicare, which threatens the future of the program, and that Speaker Ryan continues to stand in the way of a bipartisan agreement to protect the young people brought to this country through no fault of their own,” Dingell said in a statement.
Republicans, too, had their disappointments. Many were sheepish or even angry about the bushels of dollars for Democratic priorities and the return next year of $1 trillion-plus deficits.
Amash, a conservative representing the Grand Rapids area, had criticized the spending bill as “disgusting and reckless.”
But many other Republicans pointed to money they have long sought for the Pentagon, which they say needs huge sums for readiness, training and weapons modernization.
“The whole funding of the defense budget is critical given the clear threats we’re seeing in North Korea,” said Rep. Paul Mitchell, a Republican from Dryden.
Trump signed it as business hours began, and he couldn’t resist a dig.
“This Bill is a BIG VICTORY for our Military, but much waste in order to get Dem votes,” he tweeted. “Fortunately, DACA not included in this Bill, negotiations to start now!”
Detroit News Staff Writer Melissa Nann Burke contributed.
Copyright 2018 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.