Britain’s EU journey: When Churchill urged European unity

Pan Pylas
Associated Press

London — Britain officially leaves the European Union on Jan. 31 after a debilitating political period that has bitterly divided the nation since the 2016 Brexit referendum.

Difficult negotiations setting out the new relationship between Britain and its European neighbors will continue throughout 2020.

Europe has been a source of contention in Britain seemingly forever. That may be why no consensus has really ever existed over the benefits of being a member of the European Union, and why the country has been so divided in the run-up to Brexit day.

A statue of Winston Churchill is silhouetted against the Houses of Parliament and the early morning sky in London, Friday, June 24, 2016.

Though there may be no bigger lovers of the horrors of Scandinavian noir or the beaches of Greece than the British, feelings for the EU have been far more lukewarm during the country’s 47 years of membership.

Many reasons have been cited for the complex relationship. Maybe an imperial past has cast a cloud over Britain’s membership. Maybe it’s just to do with the fact there is a strip of water separating the country from what is often referred to as “the continent.” Britain has always been wary of the shifting alliances that have played out in Europe since the Norman conquest of 1066.

Whatever the motivation behind the Brexit vote in 2016, Britain has always perceived itself as a land apart.

Ironically, it was Winston Churchill who called for a “kind of United States of Europe” in the grim aftermath of World War II.

In a speech in Zurich in 1946, a year after the end of the war and after he had been resoundingly ousted as British prime minister in a general election, Churchill outlined his vision for post-war Europe.

Peace and prosperity, he said, could only come if France and Germany put aside their centuries of mistrust and start operating as partners.

“The structure of the United States of Europe, if well and truly built, will be such as to make the material strength of a single state less important,” he said. “Small nations will count as much as large ones and gain their honor by their contribution to the common cause.”

Churchill didn’t envision Britain being part of this grand endeavor. Its role, like that of the “mighty America” and even of Soviet Russia, would be to act as “friends and sponsors of the new Europe.”

That perception about Britain’s role provides one explanation to its ambiguous relationship with Europe in the decades since. It joined the club late, 16 years after the rules had been written, in fact. While a member, it often grumbled about many of the integration suggestions that came up.

It all, perhaps inevitably, culminated in that vote in June 2016, albeit a narrow 52%-48% majority in favor of leaving the club.

Perhaps Brexit was inevitable after all.