SUBSCRIBE NOW
99¢ per month for 3 months
SUBSCRIBE NOW
99¢ per month for 3 months

Cities install meters to combat panhandling

Associated Press

New Haven, Conn.

In cities across the country, parking-style meters collect loose change from donors in an attempt to cut down on panhandling — a strategy critics argue is wrongheaded and in vain.

New Haven is among the latest to install the meters, which sit curbside and collect donations in the form of cash or credit cards for programs that benefit the homeless. The city has four brightly colored meters in areas where panhandling has been a problem and plans to install six more to support local, nonprofit organizations that help the homeless.

“It’s meant to generate supplemental funds for homeless services and steer well-meaning, generously donated cash away from the business of panhandling,” Mayor Toni Harp said.

The first meters went up in 2007 in Denver, and other cities have followed suit. They were recently installed in Pasadena, California; Indianapolis; and Corpus Christi, Texas.

“We get at least one call a month from cities who are looking to replicate the program,” said Julie Smith, a spokeswoman for Denver’s Road Home, which runs the meter program in that city.

Locally, a smaller version of the program was launched in February in Detroit’s Greektown. In addition to the meters, organizers hoped to garner corporate sponsorship while gathering other donations through the website detroitdonates.org.

Some advocates for the homeless, however, say the meters do little to stop the needy from requesting handouts and question whether it’s worth the cost to install and maintain them.

Panhandling is not illegal, and people who need money will still ask for it, meters or no, said Mark Horvath, a national advocate for the homeless and founder of the advocacy group Invisible People. The meters, he said, reinforce the stereotype that all panhandlers are bums who want money for drugs or booze.

“It’s a false stereotype. A huge percentage of people who are panhandling are in housing, but they can’t afford to make ends meet,” he said.

“There are so many better solutions than putting up meters, like the permanent support of affordable housing and a living wage.”

Smith and others acknowledge they have no data or studies to show the meters have reduced panhandling, but say they are still worth installing as part of larger efforts to stem homelessness.

Joe Drury, 57, begged for change on a late December morning in Annapolis, Maryland, which has several downtown meters raising money to help defray transportation costs for people residing at a shelter.

“These meters just sit here all day, but nobody gives me nothing,” Drury said. “I can sometimes go a whole day without eating.”

In Dade County, Florida, a food and beverage tax provides about $24 million a year as part of a $61 million budget for programs to help the homeless. Meters, by comparison, bring in about $50,000 a year, said Ron Book, the chairman of the Miami-Dade County Homeless Trust.

The program began a decade ago, and there are now more than 700 meters, many paid for by local businesses and supplemented by larger donation boxes inside many buildings.

All of them, he said, help reinforce the message that there is a better way to address the problem of homelessness than throwing money into a panhandler’s cup.

In Orlando, Florida, just $2,450.07 in donations has been collected since a dozen meters were put up in 2011. That includes the more than $180 collected so far this year.

Denver has supplemented the meters with collection boxes near security checkpoints at the airport and recently began a program that allows people to text donations.

Those programs combined bring in more than $100,000 annually.

Thomas Chatmon Jr., executive director of Orlando’s downtown redevelopment board and community redevelopment agency, said officials anticipated the program would not result in a financial windfall.

“It’s just a very small part of a comprehensive and robust approach to ending homelessness,” he said. “It’s offering people an option for giving who may not be comfortable dealing physically with people who they don’t know.”