We do not live in a zero-sum world
Investopedia defines a “zero-sum game” as “a situation in which one person’s gain is equivalent to another’s loss, so the net change in wealth or benefit is zero.”
If a political leader wielding power sees the world as a zero-sum game — gains to one must mean a loss to another — it is likely that this leader will promote policies that will limit growth, wealth creation and innovative problem solving.
What a zero-sum worldview will produce more of is political, class, and ethnic resentment and strife.
It so happens we have a leader today that has this worldview and his name is President Barack Obama. It is not surprising that today’s world over which he is presiding, at home and abroad, increasingly shows these characteristics.
President Obama was very candid in a recent interview with Thomas Friedman of the New York Times in which he stated his zero-sum view of the world.
“Obama made clear,” Friedman writes, “that he is only going to involve America more deeply in places like the Middle East to the extent that different communities there agree to an inclusive politics of no victor/no vanquished.”
No suggestion that there is right and wrong, or better answers that make everyone better off and worse answers that don’t. No, in our president’s take on the world, if there is a winner who winds up better off, there must be a loser who winds up equally worse off.
According to him, notes Friedman, “… we (America) will never realize our full potential unless our two parties adopt the same outlook we’re asking of Shiites, Sunnis, and Kurds or Israelis and Palestinians: No victor, no vanquished and work together.”
This “inclusive” world view, devoid of right and wrong, true and false, better and worse, stands starkly in contrast to what Abraham Lincoln had to say when confronting a nation torn apart by the question of whether it would tolerate slavery.
“A house divided against itself cannot stand,” said Lincoln. “I believe this government cannot stand, permanently, half slave and half free. ... It will become all one thing or all the other.”
The president’s “no victor, no vanquished” take on the world is turning up the flames of the Israeli Palestinian conflict by legitimizing the falsehood that if Israelis are better off it means that Arabs will be worse off.
It perversely forces the Israelis to sit and negotiate with Hamas — an organization that even the United States officially designates as a terrorist organization.
Author George Gilder characterizes the Middle East conflict as “not between Arab and Jews but between admiration for achievement, along with a desire to replicate it, and envy accompanied by violent resentment.”
Zero-sum politics plays out in similarly destructive ways. Instead of building a culture of achievement and responsibility, politicians of the left stoke grievances of low-income Americans, inspire envy and resentment, and teach that the poor are poor because the rich are rich.
Star Parker is an author and president of CURE, Center for Urban Renewal and Education.