CLOSE

Pistons owner discusses on his plan to meet with coach next week. Rod Beard

LINKEDINCOMMENTMORE

Detroit — By record and by standard NBA reasoning, Stan Van Gundy probably should be gone. The Pistons have veered direction multiple times in his four seasons, missed the playoffs three times and now tote a flawed roster with a top-heavy, inflexible payroll.

The problem is, owner Tom Gores added to the conundrum when he authorized the trade for Blake Griffin, a worthwhile gamble that came with consequences. Now the team is boxed in, committed to Griffin, Andre Drummond and Reggie Jackson, with little room for change. In a strange way, that might save Van Gundy’s job, because a new coach (or new team president) would find it virtually impossible to start over.

It’s a conundrum that Gores says he won’t solve until he meets with Van Gundy next week. But during the Pistons’ home finale – a 108-98 loss to Toronto Monday night — the owner made one thing very clear.

More:Gores: Van Gundy’s future with Pistons to be determined

“I’m not afraid of change,” Gores said at halftime in his courtside suite. “Stan’s a very committed guy, he’s dedicated, this is not a situation where you make a change because somebody’s not dedicated. But if we have to change, Stan’s not afraid of change either. We will. But I would never make a change without talking to him.”

Speaking frankly for about 10 minutes, Gores reiterated previous statements about needing an organizational shift, large or small. He said he still saw value in the coach having personnel control, as Van Gundy does, but made no excuses for the team’s record.

I don’t think Gores would outright fire him, but it could come down to what Van Gundy is willing to accept, and how much he’s willing to change. Everything is under consideration, presumably including Van Gundy relinquishing power as president. In that scenario, perhaps Pistons vice chairman Arn Tellem would take a more active role. Gores said he’s not leaning any way, and Van Gundy’s status would depend on how their discussions go.

“We still have to make changes, we’re not winning, so that’s simple,” Gores said. “Whatever mistakes we’ve made, we have to evaluate that. I don’t want to pretend we’re going to the playoffs, we’re not. That’s just reality, and Stan and I have to talk about that.”

Autoplay
Show Thumbnails
Show Captions

It’s a question of time and timing — how much time Van Gundy deserves, and how the timing of the Griffin trade and Jackson’s injury affected the Pistons’ performance. With one game remaining, the Pistons are 38-43, and Griffin, Drummond and Jackson have played precisely four games together. It’s a dilemma for a franchise that boldly opted to skip a rebuilding step and acquire a star in Griffin, and yet still has no idea if its unorthodox Big Three can work on a high level.

Point, counterpoint

It’s fair to argue Van Gundy should be dismissed anyhow for personnel gaffes, notably in the draft. He probably wouldn’t even consider it unfair, and reiterated Monday night he wasn’t concerned about his job and was comfortable with whatever Gores decides.

More:Beard: Don't count out Stan Van Gundy yet as Pistons coach

It’s also fair to argue Jackson’s extended absence (sidelined 37 games with an ankle injury), Griffin’s late arrival, and Drummond’s continued development should buy Van Gundy the fifth year of his contract.

With Jackson in the lineup this season, the Pistons are 26-18, and made the playoffs the one year he was healthy. With all three in the lineup, the Pistons are 3-1, the lone loss in overtime at Houston.

That’s not a lot of evidence to judge, making it difficult to render a final verdict on Van Gundy without knowing whether his biggest move paid off. Again, as cordial and respectful as the owner and coach are — “He’s been my partner for four years,” Gores said — it’s clear Gores won’t be shy in his assessment.

CLOSE

Rod Beard of The Detroit News analysis subtext of Pistons owner's interview about Stan Van Gundy's status. Rod Beard

While acknowledging Jackson’s lengthy absence partly derailed the season, Gores said that wasn’t a sufficient alibi. Every time he praised Van Gundy or noted misfortune, Gores added a caveat. The Pistons recently won eight of 10, and Jackson and Griffin played well together until Griffin (ankle contusion) missed the past seven games.

“It’s just a small sample, so we can’t get confused by that,” Gores said. “I think Blake’s been a great addition, a real leader. But I don’t think I’ll take this small sample the last 10-12 games and make it our future.”

Van Gundy hasn’t been inclined to campaign for anything, but he sounds like a coach eager to see exactly what his team can be. And if Gores can be swayed, Van Gundy does have the ample ammunition that the Pistons are much more promising with Jackson.

“The story of this year — people can paint it any way they want — is we struggled without Reggie Jackson, period, that’s it,” Van Gundy said. “Our record is what it is, and you have to accept the judgment that goes with it. The only thing I’ve said is, looking forward, I have great confidence this can be a good basketball team. Obviously, we have great size and strength — when you’ve got Andre and Blake up front, you’re gonna be able to battle anybody’s frontline. Reasonably healthy, it’s got a chance to be a really good team.”

More:‘Reinvented’ ex-UM star Trey Burke finds knack with Knicks

Depends on how you define “really good,” of course. A 50-win team that can land a mid-seed in the Eastern Conference playoffs? Probably. A team that can challenge the upper echelon? Highly unlikely.

The Pistons did need a star, although the prudent path would be to draft and develop one. Van Gundy wasted that chance by bypassing Donovan Mitchell for Luke Kennard in the first round. But for those who wondered how much Griffin, 29, had left, and how engaged he would be after spending his career in Los Angeles, he’s answered impressively.

Griffin may not be the leaper and intimidator he once was, but his all-around game is even better than billed. In 25 games here, he’s averaging 19.8 points, 6.6 rebounds and 6.2 assists, and is increasingly dependable from 3-point range. His passing and court vision are tremendous and his leadership is noteworthy, taking the focus off Drummond.

Griffin ‘very optimistic’

“I’m very, very optimistic,” Griffin said. “Having Reggie, Andre, a full group healthy, ready to go, I like our squad, I think we have a pretty high ceiling to make a run at the East.”

Reggie Bullock proved he could be a decent wing player, Kennard showed signs of his touted shooting range, and Ish Smith can be valuable in his role as backup point guard. But the Pistons need more pieces, and don’t have the salary-cap space or tradeable commodities to get it.

The contracts for Griffin and Jackson are prohibitive, but would Gores consider dealing Drummond, with three years and about $80 million remaining? Doubtful, although something to consider. Drummond is still only 24 and in the midst of a career year, leading the NBA in rebounds.

Those are issues for deep into the offseason. The first business will take place next week, probably near Gores’ Los Angeles home, where he’ll meet with Van Gundy and determine the future. Van Gundy can make an argument to stay, but it’s unclear whether the owner will buy it.

bob.wojnowski@detroitnews.com

twitter.com/bobwojnowski

CLOSE

Detroit coach talks about team's 108-98 defeat to Toronto in home finale. Rod Beard

LINKEDINCOMMENTMORE